2,000-case formula stress test
Simulated scenarios · not dealer-verified
AvLu’s Outcome Simulation Lab runs 2,000 complete synthetic repair packets through the estimate, variance, and protected-offer math without presenting modeled results as real dealer evidence.
Need the complete structured file? Download JSON.
Planning and product demonstration only. These are not invoices, repair orders, predictive-accuracy results, or purchase approvals.
These counts describe the designed scenario mix. They do not measure real-world model accuracy.
Complete synthetic packets
Each case is complete enough to exercise the interface and formula, while its synthetic source prevents it from being promoted as dealer-verified evidence.
Year, make, model, and an unmistakable synthetic vehicle ID-never a plausible VIN.
A simulated repair date, scope description, parts estimate, hours, rate, and labor estimate.
Simulated parts and labor closeout values with a reconciled total.
Dollar and percentage movement from the AvLu planning estimate.
The same variance flows directly into a revised protected maximum.
The source is always AvLu’s deterministic generator, not a dealer, mechanic, quote, or invoice.
Designed stress patterns
The library is intentionally balanced across adverse, favorable, and mixed movements. That makes it useful for interface demonstrations and formula QA, not for claiming a success rate.
Loading scenario distribution…
Interactive outcome explorer
Filter the 2,000 scenarios, choose a record, and follow every dollar into the protected-offer adjustment.
Repeatable inputs and formula outputs
Identity, date, scope, cost, source, and impact
No synthetic row passes a real evidence gate
| Case | Vehicle and scope | AvLu estimate | Simulated closeout | Variance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading simulation records… | ||||
Interpret the results correctly
These cases answer “does the math and interface behave under varied inputs?” They do not answer “does AvLu predict actual repair outcomes?”
DEALER VALIDATION UNDERWAY
A completed real-world outcome still requires the same vehicle identity, dated repair evidence, attributable source, repair scope, parts and labor, estimate, closeout, variance, and formula impact.
See the dealer evidence campaignBring a real repair packet
The simulation lab demonstrates the workflow. A permissioned dealer or mechanic packet validates the outcome.